State v. Johnson & Underwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury instruction which declared that reasonable doubt did not require proof to a mathematical or scientific certainty, was not legally erroneous or misleading to the jury
• under aiding and abetting statute, not necessary for both defendants to possess a gun to justify both being convicted of aggravated robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).