State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1371
Syllabus
Final appealable order nunc pro tunc finality of judgment for appeal. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in entering a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry renumbering the counts to the proper counts utilized at trial because this action was not inconsistent with this court's jurisdiction. Further, the nunc pro tunc entry did not extend defendant's time to file an appeal nor did service of the nunc pro tunc entry affect the finality of the judgment.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-14· cited 221×
- State v. MillerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-11-30· cited 171×
- State ex rel. Rock v. School Emp. Retirement Bd.Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-08-21· cited 55×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-18· cited 8×
- State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.