Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 1371

Syllabus

Final appealable order nunc pro tunc finality of judgment for appeal. Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not err in entering a nunc pro tunc sentencing entry renumbering the counts to the proper counts utilized at trial because this action was not inconsistent with this court's jurisdiction. Further, the nunc pro tunc entry did not extend defendant's time to file an appeal nor did service of the nunc pro tunc entry affect the finality of the judgment.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.