State v. Johnson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 371
Syllabus
Pro se litigant guilty plea presentence request to withdraw plea abuse of discretion. The trial court admonished the defendant about proceeding pro se, but despite the admonishments, defendant opted to represent himself. Although presentence motions to withdraw a guilty plea should be liberally granted, there is no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea prior to sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's presentence motion to withdraw his plea. The record demonstrates that the defendant had a full and fair Crim.R. 11 hearing at which he understood the nature of the charges and possible penalties. He was given an opportunity to state his ground for withdrawal of his plea, which demonstrated only that he had a change of heart.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- Wayne Ernest Barker v. United States of America, United States of America v. Wayne Ernest BarkerTenth Circuit· 1978-07-12· cited 182×
- State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-15· cited 67×
- State v. WestleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-09· cited 29×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 15×
- State v. WalcotOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-19· cited 10×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.