Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/12/2007
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 215 Or. App. 1
- 168 P.3d 312
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a person uses “physical force” for purposes of the robbery statute by “taking the victim’s property so quickly that resis- tance is futile”
- holding that a person uses “physical force” sufficient to support a robbery conviction by “taking the victim’s property so quickly that resistance is futile”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Ortega, Rosenblum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Barbosa v. BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 118×
- United States v. Eddie Strickland, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2017-06-26· cited 25×
- Pedro Aguirre Barbosa v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-03-28· cited 12×
- United States v. Alan ShelbyNinth Circuit· 2019-09-19· cited 9×
- State v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-18· cited 6×
- United States v. DunlapD. Oregon· 2016-02-12· cited 5×
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-29· cited 3×
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court· 2025-12-30· cited 3×
- United States v. HammonsD. New Mexico· 2017-12-31
- United States v. SavathD. Oregon· 2018-03-07
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.