Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 194 Wash. App. 304
  • 374 P.3d 1206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting equal protection claim that the mandatory DNA fee statute, RCW 43.43.7541, results in a disparate impact on repeat offenders
  • rejecting equal protection challenge alleging disparate impact where no discriminatory intent shown
  • disparate impact of court fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berrey, Fearing, Lawrence, Siddoway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.