State v. Johnson
Citations
- 26 N.M. 20
- 188 P. 1109
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Practicing osteopathy or medicine without the license required by law is not a nuisance per se. P. 21</p> <p>2. In an action to enjoin one from practicing osteopathy and medicine without a license, the averments that such practice constitutes a nuisance and is greatly detrimental, dangerous and injurous to the health of the public, are statements ot conclusions and not facts, and for that reason the complaint lieltl not to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. P. 21</p>
Judges: Mechem, Parker, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-11-01· cited 76×
- State Ex Rel. Marron v. CompereNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1940-05-29· cited 15×
- People Ex Rel. Chiropractic League v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-01-28· cited 14×
- Takiguchi v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1936-03-16· cited 10×
- Town of Farmington v. MummaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-07-22· cited 7×
- State v. RobertsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1957-07-03· cited 4×
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1958-12-19· cited 3×
- Hochman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1956-01-24· cited 2×
- People ex rel. Bennett v. LamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1937-04-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.