Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 573

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in imposing restitution when the record supported the statement that the trial court had considered Defendant's ability to pay. Trial court did not err in ordering restitution be paid for the benefit of the Ohio Attorney General's Victims of Crime Fund, even if the name was not completely accurate as it was sufficient to notify the Attorney General's Office that the funds were designated for the reparations fund.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.