Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 4116

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by denying appellant's pro se post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea brought pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 where appellant's sentence was voidable, and not void, thereby his claim alleging his plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily was barred by the doctrine of res judicata for appellant could have, and should have, raised the issue as part of his direct appeal.

Judges: S. Powell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.