Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 12/20/2016
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 795 S.E.2d 126
- 251 N.C. App. 260
- 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 1319
- 2016 WL 7367968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding a defendant’s relationship with his counsel should not be weighed against the State
- “Delay caused by Defendant’s indecision about counsel, counsel’s lapse in communicating with Defendant, and counsel’s scheduling conflicts should not be weighed against the State.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Inman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-05· cited 12×
- State v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-12-04· cited 3×
- State v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-05-18
- State v. AmbrizCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-11-01
- State v. FarookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2024-12-31
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.