Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 4/5/2016

State v. Johnson

Citations

783 S.E.2d 753
246 N.C. App. 677
2016 WL 1319083
2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Even if there is some conflict between oral findings and ones that are reduced to writing, the written order controls for purposes of appeal.” (citation omitted)
“[W]e do not base our review of findings of fact and conclusions of law on the label in the order, but rather, on the substance of the finding or conclusion.”
“[W]e do not base our review of findings of fact and conclusions of law on the label in the order, but rather, on the substance of the finding or conclusion. See State v. Icard, 363 N.C. 303, 308, 677 S.E.2d 822, 826 (2009
“[W]e do not base our review of findings of - 20 - STATE BD. OF EXAM’RS OF PLUMBING, HEATING & FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS V. HUDSON Opinion of the Court fact and conclusions of law on the label in the order, but rather, on the substance of the finding or conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabria

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.