Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 2011 Ohio 3143
  • 195 Ohio App. 3d 59
  • 958 N.E.2d 977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “trial court’s use of the two-way video procedure was necessary to further the public policy of justly resolving the criminal case, while at the same time protecting the well-being of the state’s witnesses” who had been intimidated by defendant’s family
  • applying Craig test to determine admissibility of testimony via two-way, closed-circuit television when necessary because of defendant’s family’s intimidation of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sundermann, Hildebrandt, Hendon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.