Court of Appeals of Kansas· 8/29/2008
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 190 P.3d 995
- 40 Kan. App. 2d 196
- 2008 Kan. App. LEXIS 132
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reaffirming that identity theft \does not require proof of economic loss to the victim but only proof of the defendant's intent to defraud for his or her own economic benefit\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McAnany, Green, Caplinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-03-08· cited 522×
- State v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 102×
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 49×
- State v. CavanessSupreme Court of Kansas· 2004-12-03· cited 33×
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 25×
- State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-08-03· cited 24×
- State v. AlgerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 18×
- State v. LundquistCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-10-18· cited 13×
- State v. SeaburySupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-28· cited 12×
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-11-15· cited 8×
- State v. OswaldCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-07-14· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.