State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecution’s statements in closing argument constituted misconduct when they brought to the jury’s attention matters the jury would not be justified in considering

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Emmett
  Utah Supreme Court· 1992-04-07· cited 108×
• State v. Troy
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-08-29· cited 61×
• State v. Larrabee
  Utah Supreme Court· 2013-11-22· cited 43×
• State v. Palmer
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-07-22· cited 37×
• State v. Bolsinger
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-04-05· cited 36×
• State v. Cummins
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1992-08-25· cited 35×
• State v. Jones
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-02-26· cited 24×
• State v. Roberts
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-08-08· cited 22×
• State v. Smith
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-05-10· cited 19×
• State v. Andreason
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-05-06· cited 13×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-04· cited 12×
• State v. Kalisz
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Valdez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1973-08-24· cited 63×
• State v. Creviston
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-05-19· cited 41×
• State v. Kerekes
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-12-16· cited 40×
• State v. Forsyth
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-01-27· cited 37×
• State v. Jones
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 34×
• State v. Sorensen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-08-21· cited 24×
• State v. Walton
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-04-21· cited 12×
• State v. Vatsis
  Utah Supreme Court· 1960-04-20· cited 6×