Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/30/2009
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 218 P.3d 46
- 289 Kan. 870
- 2009 Kan. LEXIS 1070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a person solely diagnosed with an organic mental disorder does not meet the definition of a \mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment\ under K.S.A. 59-2946 [f][1]
- connecting word “or” ordinarily means the connected items are to be viewed in the disjunctive
- stating “and” is ordinarily conjunctive, while “or” is ordinarily disjunctive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-08-28· cited 491×
- State v. PrineSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-31· cited 107×
- State v. UrbanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-09-24· cited 98×
- State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-06-26· cited 61×
- State v. HornSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-08-20· cited 30×
- Dissmeyer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-04-08· cited 13×
- State v. Comprehensive Health of Planned ParenthoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-10-15· cited 10×
- In re Care & Treatment of SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-07-27· cited 8×
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-09-23· cited 7×
- State v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-01-07· cited 6×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-11-12· cited 1×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2010-06-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.