Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 4/7/1995

State v. Johnson

Citations

909 S.W.2d 461
1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

―Whether the acts constitute a ‗knowing killing‘ (second degree murder) or a killing due to ‗adequate provocation‘ (voluntary manslaughter) is a question for the jury.‖
“Whether the acts constitute a ‘knowing killing’ (second degree murder) or a killing due to ‘adequate provocation’ (voluntary manslaughter) is a question for the jury.”
“Whether the acts constitute a ‘knowing killing’ or a killing due to ‘adequate provocation’ is a question for the jury.”
“Whether the acts constitute a ‘knowing killing’ (second degree murder) or a killing due to ‘adequate provocation’ (voluntary manslaughter) is a question for the jury.”
“Whether the acts constitute a ‘knowing killing’ (second degree murder) or a killing due to ‘adequate provocation’ (voluntary manslaughter) is a question for the jury.”
“Whether the acts constitute a ‘knowing killing’ (second degree murder) or a killing due to ‘adequate provocation’ (voluntary manslaughter) is a question for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wade, Welles, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.