Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2/18/2011

State v. Johnson

Citations

13 A.3d 1064
2011 R.I. LEXIS 17
2011 WL 576082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[T]here is an inescapable conclusion that, even if there were a question about the admissibility of [certain] testimony, * * * such testimony was merely cumulative and therefore not prejudicial to [the defendant].”
“[T]here is an inescapable conclusion that, even if there were a question about the admissibility of [certain] testimony, * * * such testimony was merely cumulative and therefore not prejudicial to [the defendant].”
“[T]here is an inescapable conclusion that, even if there were a question about the admissibility of [certain] testimony, * * * such testimony was merely cumulative and therefore not prejudicial to [the defendant].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Suttell, Goldberg, Flaherty, Robinson, Indeglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.