Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 9/30/1999

State v. Johnson

Citations

15 S.W.3d 515
1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant’s concession constitutes substantial evidence of a violation, and the trial -8- court’s revocation based thereon is not an abuse of discretion
holding that a defendant’s concession constitutes substantial evidence of a violation, and the trial court’s revocation based thereon is not an abuse of discretion
holding that defendant’s concession of act constituting violation of probation constitutes substantial evidence of violation, and trial court’s revocation based thereon is not abuse of discretion
concluding that the defendant’s concession that he was a frequent user of marijuana while on probation supported the trial court’s conclusion that a violation of probation occurred
holding that a defendant’s concession of an act constituting violation of probation constitutes substantial evidence of violation, and trial court’s revocation based thereon is not abuse of discretion
holding that a defendant’s concession of an act constituting violation of probation constitutes substantial evidence of violation, and trial court’s revocation based thereon is not abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joe G. Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

146 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.