Nebraska Supreme Court· 7/5/1985

State v. Johnson

Citations

370 N.W.2d 136
220 Neb. 392
1985 Neb. LEXIS 1096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

upholding admission of prior consistent statement because “defense counsel had sown the sinister seed of innuendo” that testimony had been fabricated
noting that “victim’s credibility had already been attacked extensively” on cross-examination
upholding admission of prior consistent statement because \defense counsel had sown the sinister seed of innuendo\ that testimony had been fabricated
abrogated on other grounds, State v. Morris, 251 Neb. 23, 554 N.W.2d 627 (1996)
victim’s statement during interview with attorney was not an “other proceeding” under state equivalent of FRE 801(d)(1)(A); to the extent that Castro-Ayon supported that conclusion, it was “unique—and likely to remain so”
if witness being impeached admits to prior inconsistent statement, then he or she has been impeached and further extrinsic evidence is neither necessary nor generally allowed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krivosha, Boslaugh, White, Hastings, Caporale, Shanahan, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.