State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding fact that one attorney from large public defense organization represents defendant and another staff attorney from same organization represented prosecution witness in concluded and unrelated criminal matter does not create per se conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Higgins
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1979-12-06· cited 191×
• State v. Blair
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-31· cited 146×
• State v. Mitchell
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1978-03-24· cited 57×
• State v. Abbott
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-07-01· cited 32×
• State v. Repp
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-08-18· cited 28×
• Yoakum v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-03-23· cited 25×
• State v. O'DELL
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-04· cited 24×
• State v. Boley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1978-05-01· cited 18×
• DePriest v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2017-02-28· cited 17×
• Hickey v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-07-06· cited 16×
• State v. McClanahan
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-26· cited 15×
• State v. Morris
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-11-22· cited 15×
• State v. Weeks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-06-18· cited 13×
• State v. Manis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1981-04-06· cited 11×
• State v. Powell
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-04· cited 10×
• Gordon v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-22· cited 8×
• State v. Conley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-08-06· cited 8×
• Poole v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1992-03-10· cited 8×
• State v. Taylor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-07-08· cited 6×
• Douglas v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-01-19· cited 6×