Idaho Supreme Court· 4/27/1954
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 269 P.2d 769
- 75 Idaho 157
- 1954 Ida. LEXIS 207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where judgment had been affirmed on appeal, the district court did not have jurisdiction to amend judgment by placing defendant on probation
- where judgment had been affirmed on appeal, the district court did not have jurisdiction to amend judgment by placing defendant on probation
- where judgment had been affirmed on appeal, the district court did not have jurisdiction to amend judgment by placing defendant on probation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Porter, Givens, Taylor, Keeton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JakoskiIdaho Supreme Court· 2003-10-29· cited 101×
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court· 1956-12-04· cited 81×
- State v. KnutsenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2003-01-29· cited 31×
- State v. HartwigIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-02-02· cited 24×
- State v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-02-10· cited 23×
- State v. IversonIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-04-16· cited 18×
- State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 8×
- State v. WoodburyIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-05-04· cited 7×
- Forbush v. ThatcherIdaho Supreme Court· 1957-03-07· cited 2×
- Crouch v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 1970-03-23· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.