Skip to main content

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 525 P.2d 532
  • 1974 Alas. LEXIS 261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing presentation of hearsay to grand jury as “justifiable” because of “the necessity of [the witness’s] absence”
  • validity upheld when the declarant was a store security guard and trained police officer whose statements were substantially corroborated by a testifying eyewitness
  • validity upheld when the declarant was a store security guard and trained police officer whose statements were substantially corroborated by a testifying eyewitness
  • Civil Rule 77 governing motion practice is made applicable to criminal actions by Criminal Rule 50(b)
  • Civil Rule 77 governing motion practice is made applicable to criminal actions by Criminal Rule 50(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Witz, Con-Nor, Erwin, Boochever, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.