Utah Supreme Court· 3/31/1989

State v. Johnson

Citations

771 P.2d 1071
105 Utah Adv. Rep. 16
1989 Utah LEXIS 26
1989 WL 29588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a trial court's erroneous mention of a non-existent second charged offense to a jury was harmless error because there was no indication that the jury considered it
holding that a trial court’s erroneous mention of a non‐existent second charged offense to a jury was harmless error because there was no indication that the jury 20110204‐CA 35 2013 UT App 228 State v. Davis considered it
stating that “the act of entering alone does not give rise to an inference that the actor entered with the requisite intent to constitute burglary” (quotation simplified)
“A person is guilty of burglary if he or she (1) enters or remains unlawfully in a building (2) with intent to commit a felony, theft, or assault.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.