Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/6/1968
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 439 P.2d 86
- 201 Kan. 126
- 1968 Kan. LEXIS 348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “this court has always been committed to the rule that one seeking reversal of a judgment because of erroneous exclusion of evidence has the burden of demonstrating prejudice, as well as error”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 273×
- State v. DillonIdaho Supreme Court· 1970-06-25· cited 74×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1970-03-07· cited 60×
- State v. StewardSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-03-06· cited 56×
- State v. RandolSupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-06-09· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 15×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas· 1971-01-23· cited 12×
- State v. RamboSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-03-04· cited 11×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-04-08· cited 70×
- Texas v. Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court· 1967-11-06· cited 38×
- State v. DonahueSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-07-14· cited 32×
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1967-12-09· cited 21×
- State v. LinvilleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1938-06-11· cited 18×
- Zimmer v. KansasSupreme Court· 1967-11-06· cited 18×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1959-07-10· cited 12×
- Wise v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1864-02-15· cited 10×
- Dunn v. CrouseSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-11-02· cited 7×
- State v. AkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1965-03-06· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.