Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 5/21/1985

State v. Johnson

Citations

  • 700 P.2d 1125
  • 1985 Utah LEXIS 824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the accused persons clause applies only before final judgment, filing fees may be imposed in criminal appeals so long as there is an exception for indigent defendants
  • holding that because the accused persons clause applies only before final judgment, filing fees may be imposed in criminal appeals so long as there is an exception for indigent defendants
  • holding plain language of rule 8(a) establishes that \the timely payment of fees on an appeal from the district court to this court is no longer jurisdictional\
  • noting the excusable neglect standard is strict and not meant to cover the typical excuse that a lawyer was simply too busy to comply with the filing deadline
  • \It is generally accepted that the imposition of sentence is required for finality of a judgment of conviction.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howe, Hall, Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.