Washington Supreme Court· 12/24/1969
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 462 P.2d 933
- 77 Wash. 2d 423
- 1969 Wash. LEXIS 603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the trial court has a duty to conduct the trial fairly, expeditiously and impartially, it has a corresponding power to adopt practices and procedures reasonably designed to secure such ends.”
- “Because the trial court has a duty to conduct the trial fairly, expeditiously and impartially, it has a corresponding power to adopt practices and procedures reasonably designed to secure such ends.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court· 2006-02-22· cited 1,119×
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-02· cited 520×
- State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court· 1974-08-15· cited 182×
- State v. VanceWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-01-22· cited 156×
- Sanders v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 2010-09-16· cited 132×
- State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court· 1986-10-23· cited 84×
- In re the Marriage of ZiglerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 72×
- In Re Marriage of Zigler and SidwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 69×
- State v. WhalonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-01-15· cited 60×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-26· cited 51×
- State v. SexsmithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-10· cited 43×
- Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-04-06· cited 42×
- State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1974-06-13· cited 37×
- State v. MonschkeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-06-01· cited 37×
- State v. HakimiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-26· cited 33×
- State v. HakimiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-09-17· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Leis v. OutcaltOhio Supreme Court· 1982-08-04· cited 31×
- State v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court· 1972-03-09· cited 30×
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-07-26· cited 29×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-05-09· cited 24×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1893-10-30· cited 250×
- United States v. FordSupreme Court· 1879-04-18· cited 135×
- United States v. Carl D. SchaeferSeventh Circuit· 1962-03-16· cited 94×
- State v. BaddaWashington Supreme Court· 1963-10-24· cited 82×
- United States v. Buffalo Savings BankSupreme Court· 1962-06-11· cited 66×
- United States v. LevyThird Circuit· 1946-02-12· cited 50×
- Melvin Andre Taylor, AKA James A. Barker, AKA James Tate v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1967-12-19· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. SCHWARTZSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-14· cited 33×
- State v. DoonWashington Supreme Court· 1893-11-24· cited 33×
- State v. FairfaxWashington Supreme Court· 1953-06-25· cited 23×
- State v. WeaverWashington Supreme Court· 1962-05-31· cited 22×
- State v. CampWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-10· cited 16×
- State v. EichmanWashington Supreme Court· 1966-09-22· cited 10×
- Shaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-01-09· cited 8×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-10-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.