State v. Joas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that similar endangerment language expressed “ideas which find adequate interpretation in common usage and understanding” and was not unconstitutionally vague
• sustaining statute prohibiting careless driving as sufficiently specific to withstand constitutional scrutiny
• sustaining statute prohibiting careless driving as sufficiently specific to withstand constitutional scrutiny
• appeal to county court on conviction by municipal court of motor vehicle offense “results in a trial de novo * * * [that] nullifies the proceedings before the municipal court”
• appeal to county court on conviction by municipal court of motor vehicle offense \results in a trial de novo * * * [that] nullifies the proceedings before the municipal court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).