State v. J.M.W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Connecticut lemon law was enacted in order to provide consumers of new motor vehicles additional equitable remedies for the enforcement of express warranties made by vehicle manufacturers
• fundamental difference between voluntary and compulsory arbitration requires a different standard of judicial review
• fundamental difference between voluntary and compulsory arbitration requires a different standard of judicial review
• no right to jury trial under state warranty act because it was essentially equitable claim for specific performance or rescission; superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in General Motors Corp. v. Dohmann, 247 Conn. 274, 722 A.2d 1205 (1998)
• Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assn. II

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).