State v. J.M.D.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4158
Syllabus
Juvenile appeals the denial of his motion for judicial release to court supervision from a Department of Youth Services commitment. The appeal is dismissed for lack of final appealable order. A juvenile lacks any substantial right to judicial release to court supervision from a Department of Youth Services commitment under R.C. 2152.22. Judicial release by the juvenile court is an act of grace. Appeal dismissed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an exception to the general rule of giving court rulings retroactive effect includes decisions establishing a new principle of law unrelated to jurisdiction
- noting federal 10 classifications distinguishing among groups of noncitizens are “valid unless wholly 11 irrational”
- “We apply the three-pronged test outlined in Chevron Oil (1) in a civil case; (2) when we announce a new rule of law, as distinct from applying a new rule that we or the Supreme Court previously announced; (3) and when the new rule does not concern our jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.