Skip to main content

State v. J.L.S.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4173

Syllabus

Because juvenile court in its decision applied an incorrect standard as to one factor, made inconsistent or unsupported findings, and failed to comply with R.C. 2152.12(B)(3) by indicating the specific factors that were applicable and that the court weighed in making its amenability determination, there was not sufficient clarity to enable meaningful appellate review. Assignment of error sustained. Judgment reversed.

Judges: Dorrian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.