Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/10/1986
State v. Jim
Citations
- 725 P.2d 372
- 81 Or. App. 189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Defendant raises the same issue in two ways. First, he challenges the state’s jurisdiction. Second, he raises a treaty defense. The analysis in both cases is the same.”
- “No regulation applied to off reservation treaty hunting can be valid or enforceable unless and until it has been shown reasonable and necessary to conservation as defined by federal law.” (Brackets and internal quotation marks omitted.)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Warren, Rossman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-09-10· cited 13×
- State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-08-25· cited 10×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-20· cited 8×
- Confederated Tribes of Colville Reservation v. AndersonE.D. Washington· 2011-01-26· cited 5×
- State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-12-29· cited 2×
- State v. SettlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-10-08· cited 1×
- Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. AndersonE.D. Washington· 2011-01-03· cited 1×
- State v. McCormack/SenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-09-08· cited 1×
- State v. WinishutCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-09-10
- State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-04-20
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court· 1973-03-27· cited 698×
- New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 405×
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court· 1905-05-15· cited 397×
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 390×
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 379×
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 267×
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 251×
- Department of Game of Wash. v. Puyallup TribeSupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 132×
- Sohappy v. SmithD. Oregon· 1969-07-08· cited 82×
- United States v. State of WashingtonW.D. Washington· 1974-03-22· cited 59×
- Carl W. Mullis Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. NicholsonSupreme Court· 1963-10-14· cited 58×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1975-07-23· cited 37×
- People v. McCoveyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-07-26· cited 32×
- State v. GowdyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1969-12-12· cited 13×
- State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-09-10· cited 13×
- Maison v. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian ReservationSupreme Court· 1963-10-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.