Skip to main content

State v. Jiles

Citations

  • 767 N.W.2d 27
  • 2009 Minn. App. LEXIS 114
  • 2009 WL 1751701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “EJJ adjudications are considered convictions for purposes of sentencing”
  • “EJJ adjudications are considered convictions for purposes of sentencing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toussaint, Hudson, Harten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.