Skip to main content

State v. Jeter

Citations

  • 609 So. 2d 1019
  • 1992 WL 350737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a witness need not be qualified as a footprint expert in order to testify concerning a comparison between an accused’s shoes and shoe prints found at the scene of the crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sexton, Victory and Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.