Skip to main content
· 4/14/1972

State v. Jesmer

Citations

  • 196 N.W.2d 924
  • 293 Minn. 442
  • 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when statutory language is unambiguous, further construction is neither necessary nor permitted
  • stating that when statutory language is unambiguous, further construction is neither necessary nor permitted
  • “In construing statutes, we have said that where language is unambiguous, the clearly expressed intent must be given effect and there is no room for construction.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson, Otis, Rogosheske, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.