State v. Jerde

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “both prosecutors unnecessarily commented on a written presentence report that was already before the court,... the prosecutors underscored aggravating factors”
• “Without prompting from the court, the first prosecutor laid the foundation by articulating several factual and legal arguments that would support an exceptional sentence.”
• “Without prompting from the court, the first prosecutor laid the foundation by articulating several factual and legal arguments that would support an exceptional sentence.”
• prosecutor undercut plea agreement by, among other things, “highlighting aggravating factors and even add[ing] an aggravating factor not found in the presentence report”
• breach where the prosecutor repeatedly emphasized aggravating factors that supported an exceptional sentence, despite the State’s obligation to make a mid- range sentencing recommendation
• breach where the State emphasized aggravating factors when obligated to make a midrange sentence recommendation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).