State v. Jentzen

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 33

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress where appellant was not subject to a custodial interrogation by officers. Rather, evidence demonstrated officers had responded to appellant's home to perform a wellness check, and appellant was not handcuffed, threatened, overpowered, tricked, or coerced into speaking with officers about his efforts to self-medicate by huffing a can of aerosol duster.