Missouri Court of Appeals· 2/24/2006
State v. Jensen
Citations
- 184 S.W.3d 586
- 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 203
- 2006 WL 436052
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because there was 4 evidence that Defendant’s penis was erect, it is reasonable to infer that he was aroused.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phillip R. Garrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
- State v. SladekSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-06-30· cited 206×
- State v. LoveMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-04-22· cited 19×
- State v. WaddellMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-06-14· cited 8×
- State v. BlomMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-05-01· cited 3×
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2001-07-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.