State v. Jennings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring the second sentencing court in multi-state-sentencing situation to specify whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively
• “It is the second sentencing court which specifies whether the sentences run concurrently or consecutively.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hahn
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-05-31· cited 15×
• State v. Roy
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2018-10-08· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Patterson
  California Supreme Court· 1966-03-17· cited 50×
• State v. Ott
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-01-06· cited 31×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-03· cited 16×
• State v. Petersen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-10-10· cited 10×
• State v. Wesenberg
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-05-22· cited 9×
• In Re Portwood
  California Court of Appeal· 1965-08-03· cited 9×
• Bail v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-15· cited 1×
• Raddatz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-16· cited 1×