State v. J.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the juveniles' argument that, because the Legislature did not expressly include juveniles in the surcharge statutes, it meant to exclude them
• rejecting the juveniles’ argument that, because the Legislature did not expressly include juveniles in the surcharge statutes, it meant to exclude them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• V.K.E. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 55×
• W.J.H. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-15· cited 2×
• State v. JC
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-19
• WJH v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-15
• VKE v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06
• S.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-11
• C.C. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-08
• T.N. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-08
• E.G. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-08
• J.G. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-08
• J.C. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-02-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• V.K.E. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-27· cited 41×
• S.S.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-03· cited 23×
• State v. Menuto
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-04· cited 19×
• State v. N.P.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-15· cited 12×