Skip to main content
· 7/4/2017

State v. Jason Dakota Baxter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “statements, together with [a letter] from [the appellee’s] attorney” constituted “ample evidence” of an intention to violate the contract
  • reasoning that “statements, together with [a letter] from [the appellee’s] attorney” constituted “ample evidence” of an intention to violate the contract
  • first quoting Stanley-Bostitch, Inc. v. Regenerative Environmental Equipment Co., Inc., 786 A.2d 1063, 1065 (R.I. 2001); then quoting 17A Am. Jur. 2d Contracts § 381 (2019)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.