State v. James Careau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ordinarily the degree of harm suffered is a fact question for a jury
• reiterating issue to be factual one for jury and rejecting view that gunshot wound necessarily entails great bodily harm
• assuming the instruction was factually appropriate and proceeding directly to clear error analysis
• defining standard of review for failure to give lesser included instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).