State v. James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ineffective assistance of counsel claim regarding possible immigration consequences would have been more appropriately raised in habeas corpus proceeding, even though facts did not indicate that removal proceedings had been initiated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Lage
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-03-26· cited 8×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Lubesky
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-03-19· cited 84×
• State v. Gonzalez
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-29· cited 66×
• Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District Commission
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-01-01· cited 63×
• State v. Aquino
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-08· cited 31×
• State v. Malcolm
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-21· cited 27×
• State v. Aquino
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-06-07· cited 16×
• State v. Hall
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-01-24· cited 10×