State v. James
Citations
- 106 La. 462
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. It has been repeatedly held, and the same Is now the settled practice In criminal appeals, that testimony found recorded In the transcript will not be noticed unless the same comes up as part of a bill of exceptions.</p> <p>2. Either the testimony, upon the admissibility vel non of which the court Is to pass, must be copied into the bill, or else, if detached therefrom, must be referred to in the bill and specifically made part thereof.</p>
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HaddadSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1952-03-24· cited 38×
- State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1950-11-06· cited 34×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1971-02-24· cited 29×
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1953-07-03· cited 24×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1961-12-11· cited 5×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1965-11-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.