Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2/11/2010
State v. James
Citations
- 689 S.E.2d 643
- 386 S.C. 650
- 2010 S.C. App. LEXIS 52
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a mere presence charge was not warranted when the State's theory did not involve accomplice liability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Williams, Pieper, Lockemy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14· cited 45×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-06-26· cited 36×
- State v. PeayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-04· cited 17×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-03-18· cited 12×
- State v. StokesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 10×
- Peterson v. PorterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-06-29· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.