Skip to main content

State v. James

Citations

  • 511 P.2d 556
  • 85 N.M. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a jury, in determining whether a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity, “is not required to accept expert opinion and to reject contradictory non-expert opinion”
  • jury apparently not wowed by expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hernandez, Hendley, Sutin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.