New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/20/1966
State v. James
Citations
- 415 P.2d 543
- 76 N.M. 416
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The consolidation of the petty offenses for trial does not change their nature * * * *\
- “The consolidation of the petty offenses for trial does not change their nature ****”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waldo Spiess
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-06-04· cited 40×
- United States v. Mark Potvin and Chuck WinslowTenth Circuit· 1973-08-24· cited 29×
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-02-05· cited 20×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1973-02-26· cited 19×
- State v. United Bonding Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1970-02-09· cited 14×
- Vallejos v. BarnhartNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 10×
- City of Fort Lauderdale v. ByrdDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-12-30· cited 7×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-02-20
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hamilton v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1959-06-04· cited 28×
- Morris Ex Rel. Morris v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-09-23· cited 24×
- Richardson Ford Sales v. CumminsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 20×
- State v. GravesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-10-07· cited 13×
- Aragon v. KasulkaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1961-05-08· cited 9×
- Reece v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1943-12-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.