State v. Jaiman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether a statement is inconsistent for purposes of impeachment evidence is a determination for the trial judge
• “[T]he Confrontation Clause ‘guarantees only an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.’ ”
• affirming introduction of witness’s police statement under Rule 801(d)(1)(A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).