State v. Jahn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “formulation” of an attorney-client privilege doctrine is reviewed de novo, whereas “[t]he application of properly formulated doctrine to the facts remains a matter of discretion for the district court”
• “Having concluded that no contract exists, there can be no derivative implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing applicable to these parties.”
• \state claims alleging misconduct between parties after the patent has issued\ are not preempted whereas claims alleging \bad faith misconduct by the applicant against the PTO\ are
• “The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing governs conduct of parties after they have entered into a contract; without a contract, there is no covenant to be breached.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).