State v. Jacobson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the statute vests the decision within the discretion of the trial court, we will not disturb that decision unless an abuse of discretion is readily apparent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sammons
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-02-02· cited 25×
• State ex rel. Neely v. Sherrill
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-07-16· cited 13×
• State v. Ketchum
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-16· cited 3×
• State v. Birdsall
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-04· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Re Welisch
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1917-02-26· cited 31×
• Bowman v. Hall
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1957-09-30· cited 21×
• State v. Russell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-11-21· cited 8×
• Santanello v. Cooper
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-06-23· cited 4×
• State v. Jacobson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-19· cited 4×
• State v. Norgard
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1972-09-28· cited 1×