Skip to main content

State v. . Jacobs

Citations

  • 10 S.E. 1031
  • 106 N.C. 695

Syllabus

<p>Expression of Opinion — Peremptory Challenge — Conduct of Defendant — •Evidence.</p> <p>1. A remark of the Judge made before trial begun, that the jailor had informed Kim. the-prisoner “would escape if he had the opportunity” is not an expression of opinion upon the facts prohibited by the Act of 1796.</p> <p>2. The right of peremptory challenge is a right to reject, not to select; hence when there are two defendants, one cannot complain that the other peremptorily challenged a juror who was acceptable to himself.</p> <p>3. The conduct of a prisoner when arrested is competent to be shown in evidence.</p>

Judges: Clake

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.