State v. . Jacobs
Citations
- 10 S.E. 1031
- 106 N.C. 695
Syllabus
<p>Expression of Opinion — Peremptory Challenge — Conduct of Defendant — •Evidence.</p> <p>1. A remark of the Judge made before trial begun, that the jailor had informed Kim. the-prisoner “would escape if he had the opportunity” is not an expression of opinion upon the facts prohibited by the Act of 1796.</p> <p>2. The right of peremptory challenge is a right to reject, not to select; hence when there are two defendants, one cannot complain that the other peremptorily challenged a juror who was acceptable to himself.</p> <p>3. The conduct of a prisoner when arrested is competent to be shown in evidence.</p>
Judges: Clake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.