Supreme Court of Kansas· 10/21/2011
State v. Jacobs
Citations
- 263 P.3d 790
- 293 Kan. 465
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider an argument that imposing consecutive sentences is an abuse of discretion\
- in context of rejecting appellate jurisdiction over consecutive combination of grid sentence and sentence arrived at after departure from Jessica’s Law mandatory minimum, Jessica’s Law sentence described as “presumptive”
- in context of rejecting appellate jurisdiction over consecutive combination of grid sentence and sentence arrived at after departure from Jessica’s Law mandatory minimum, Jessica’s Law sentence described as “presumptive”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-09· cited 106×
- State v. BerriozabalSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-12-10· cited 105×
- State v. HuertaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-03-18· cited 98×
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-03-10· cited 49×
- State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas· 2006-10-27· cited 45×
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 36×
- State v. SellersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-04-22· cited 36×
- State v. BramlettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2002-03-08· cited 26×
- State v. SellersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-06-22· cited 15×
- State v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-09-01· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.